Casino Watch Focus has reported on the ongoing battle to properly regulate online gambling through the Wire Act. The Wire Act’s long standing language and interpretation limited online gambling, yet the Obama Administration claimed it only applied to sports betting, thus freeing the way for all other forms of online gambling. The current Administration reversed that puzzling interpretation and declared the Wire Act applied beyond sports betting. Recently, a US District Court upheld the Obama Administration interpretation, and the DOJ asked Attorney’s General to hold off enforcement until the issue could be properly vetted. An online source reports:
The DOJ in 2011 had stated that the Wire Act applied only to sports wagering. But it *reversed course with a memo from 2018 expanding the possible reach for federal prosecution, which triggered worries about its applicability to online gambling, lotteries, and other forms of gaming that potentially cross state lines.
The New Hampshire District judge had forecast that the case would likely reach the*US Supreme Court*. While the case is going on, the DOJ has said it would not enforce the new interpretation of the Wire Act until 2020.
The *Department of Justice* filed its intent to appeal a district court decision on the Wire Act to the First Circuit Court of Appeals. In June, a federal judge in the New Hampshire District ruled that the Wire Act applies only to sports betting, and not to other forms of interstate gaming.
For more information on the dangers of gambling, please visit CASINO WATCH & CASINO WATCH FOUNDATION