Casino Watch Focus has reported on the ongoing efforts to regulate casino gambling in Missouri. Each state has different laws and Missouri originally only allowed for 2 hour river boat gambling excursions. With each passing year, the expansion of gambling through the erosion of the laws has resulted in 13 full standing casinos. Those casinos do technically float and they have to be located on either the Missouri or Mississippi rivers, but to the casual observer, it appears that Missouri has 13 large and free standing casinos operating. So, perhaps it’s not too surprising that every few years someone new wants to see a new casino in a part of the state that’s prohibited by the constitution. Branson has been the most popular venue debated, but Osage beach has been discussed in relation to a possible tribal casino. Now it would appear that much like the Netflix television show Ozark, there is discussion of trying to set up a casino on a new waterway. Specifically, Rep. Rocky Miller, who was a consultant to the show, is out promoting a resolution he has filed in hopes of adding the Osage river to the accepted venue list. The Springfield News Leader reports:
A legislator from around the Lake of the Ozarks wants to allow riverboat gambling there. No, this is not a recap of the Netflix show with Jason Bateman. Rep. Rocky Miller, R-Lake Ozark, filed a real resolution in the Missouri capitol Friday that would ask voters to add the Osage River to the list of waterways where casinos are permitted.
Miller said he consulted on the Netflix show “Ozark,” which centers on the Byrde family’s efforts to launder money for a Mexican drug cartel in Osage Beach. Season 2 focuses on their efforts to open a riverboat casino at Lake of the Ozarks. And Miller says he told the showrunners about the law.
Miller’s approach wouldn’t necessarily establish a casino in the area right away because there is a hard cap of 13 casino licenses that can be granted. His proposal would simply open the Osage river up to an acceptable venue, so if one of the licenses would become available. The News Leader continues:
The resolution wouldn’t necessarily bring anything to his area immediately. It wouldn’t touch the limit voters put on the casino licenses in 2008, and all 13 of those are currently in use. But if one were to come available, he said, his area “would become a great option to revive some revenue.”
It’s not clear how much interest there is in the General Assembly this year. Miller said he thinks there’s a chance it gets through the House, though the always-mercurial Senate is a bigger question mark. He said he thought leaving the cap alone would help with the casino lobby, though. He added that requiring a public vote on the issue could be a way to pitch the bill as well.
The odds are most certainly stacked against the idea of expanded casino gambling. The constitution would need changed to allow the law, meaning the path of least resistance might be an initiative petition, a direct vote of the people. History would indicate a long shot though, as this exact issue was defeated overwhelmingly in Branson.
For more information on the dangers of gambling, please visit CASINO WATCH & CASINO WATCH FOUNDATION