Casino Watch Focus has reported on the many failed attempts by New Jersey to legalize sports betting in its state. There most recent legislative attempt was shut down by the court and they have appealed the case to the Supreme Court. Major opposition have been seen from the NCAA, NFL, NHL, MLB and the federal government. The most recent communication to the Supreme Court is another blow to New Jersey’s sports betting hopes and once that might be difficult to overcome. An online political source reports the details:
When the U.S. Supreme Court in January delayed a decision on whether consider allowing sports betting in New Jersey, justices said they first wanted to hear what President Donald Trump ‘s administration had to say.
The administration finally weighed in, and its message was not what the state wanted to hear: Acting Solicitor General Jeffrey B. Wall said New Jersey didn’t have a case.
The state’s effort to get around the federal ban on sports betting by repealing state laws prohibiting such wagering and allowing to proceed without regulation “is no different than a positive enactment authorizing such gambling,” Wall wrote in a 24-page brief.
The Supreme Court can still choose to hear the case, but the odds don’t seem to be in New Jersey’s favor. ESPN reports why the recommendation to the Supreme Court to not accept the case is so detrimental to New Jersey:
The United States Solicitor General’s office filed a brief on Wednesday recommending that the Supreme Court decline to review New Jersey’s latest effort to offer legal sports betting. The Supreme Court, which in January asked the Department of Justice for its view on the case, is expected to decide whether to accept New Jersey’s appeal by the end of June. According to a 2009 academic study the Supreme Court follows the recommendation of the Solicitor General 79.6 percent of the time.
For more information on the dangers of gambling, please visit CASINO WATCH & CASINO WATCH FOUNDATION